Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Med ; 11(21)2022 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36362731

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since there is no available data on temporal trends of caesarean section (CS) rates in pregnant women with COVID-19 through the pandemic, we aimed to analyze the trends in caesarean section rate in a large cohort of pregnant women with COVID-19, according to the Robson Ten Group Classification System of deliveries. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled pregnant women with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who delivered in our center between March 2020 and November 2021. Deliveries were classified, according to the Robson group classification, and according to three time periods: (1) deliveries from March 2020 to December 2020; (2) deliveries from January 2021 to April 2021; (3) deliveries from May 2021 to November 2021. We compared pregnancy characteristics and incidence of caesarean section, according to the Robson category in the total population, and according to the three time periods. RESULTS: We included 457 patients matching the inclusion criteria in our analysis. We found that overall CS rate significantly decreased over time from period 1 to period 3 (152/222, 68.5% vs. 81/134, 60.4% vs. 58/101, 57.4%, χ2 = 4.261, p = 0.039). CS rate significantly decreased over time in Robson category 1 (48/80, 60% vs. 27/47,57.4% vs. 8/24, 33.3%, χ2 = 4.097, p = 0.043) and Robson category 3 (13/42, 31% vs. 6/33, 18.2% vs. 2/22, 9.1%, χ2 = 4.335, p = 0.037). We also found that the incidence of induction of labor significantly increased over time (8/222, 3.6% vs. 12/134, 9% vs. 11/101, 10.9%, χ2 = 7.245, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Our data provide an overview of the temporal changes in the management and obstetric outcome of COVID-19 pregnant women through the pandemic, confirming that standards of obstetrical assistance for pregnancies complicated by SARS-CoV-2 infection improved over time.

2.
Menopause ; 27(4): 418-422, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31934950

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of rescue fractional microablative CO2 laser treatment in women with severe symptoms and sexual dysfunction related to lichen sclerosus not responsive to long-term ultra-potent topical corticosteroid treatment. METHODS: Consecutive eligible women with lichen sclerosus referred to our unit who received fractional microablative CO2 laser treatment after failure of ultra-potent topical corticosteroid treatment were enrolled in the study. The diagnosis was confirmed by histological assessment in all cases. Patients underwent two cycles of CO2 laser every 30 to 40 days. The severity of lichen sclerosus-related symptoms, sexual function, and procedure discomfort were evaluated with a visual analog scale in the same individual at baseline, after completion of each treatment cycle. Follow-up visits were scheduled during each treatment cycle and at least 1 month after completion of the treatment. The Friedman ANOVA test was used to evaluate differences in the visual analog scale scores of each symptom during treatment. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus were screened, 40 of whom fulfilled the eligibility criteria. We found a significant improvement in vulvar itching (χ [2] = 31,182, P < 0.001), vulvar dryness (χ [2] = 40,364, P < 0.001), superficial dyspareunia (χ [2] = 37,488, P < 0.001), and sensitivity during intercourse (χ [2] = 22,143, P < 0.001) after two CO2 laser cycles. Pain related to probe movement and laser application was low and did not change significantly consequent to treatment. No systemic or local adverse effects occurred during or after laser treatment. CONCLUSION: Fractional microablative CO2 laser treatment is safe and might represent an effective rescue procedure for patients suffering from lichen sclerosus who fail to respond to long-term ultra-potent topical corticosteroid treatment. These preliminary findings require further study with adequately powered randomized controlled trials.


Asunto(s)
Láseres de Gas/uso terapéutico , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/terapia , Liquen Escleroso Vulvar/terapia , Anciano , Clobetasol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/etiología , Liquen Escleroso Vulvar/complicaciones , Liquen Escleroso Vulvar/fisiopatología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...